GERD Negotiations Dead End: What Is Egypt’s Future Strategy, Diplomacy Or Conflict?

updated June, 202

In 1870s, Khedive Ismail Pasha of Egypt ordered his Chief of Staff, William Wing Loring, to invade Ethiopia and annex…

In 1870s, Khedive Ismail Pasha of Egypt ordered his Chief of Staff, William Wing Loring, to invade Ethiopia and annex the Abbay river basin for the Khedivate crown. This followed the successful annexation of Sanjak of Habesh in 1866, which precipitated the dissolution of the Ottoman Habesh Eyalet that occurred in 1869. With the Sanjak providing a beachhead that allowed for lodgement of Egyptian troops in Keren and Massawa, the Khedive expected the inland expedition into the heartland of Ethiopia to be easy. It was not to be.

This plan to control the Blue Nile was thwarted by the Tigrayan trio of Emperor Yohannes IV, Ras Woldemichael Solomon, and Ras Alula “Abba Nega” Engida. The trio defeated the Khedivate imperial campaign at Gura in 1876. For Ethiopia, this victory was a testament to its robust defensive realism, while for Egypt, it invalidated its offensive realism besides angering the European creditors who financed the campaign. For Egypt, what was worse was that the Egyptian army had been trained and commanded by Americans and Europeans.

The defeat of the Egyptian army at the hands of Ethiopians ended Egyptian plans to militarily conquer Ethiopia and earned Ras Engida the moniker “Garibaldi of Abyssinia”. For Egypt, the plans to colonize lands in the Upper Nile basin – that now form the nations of Sudan, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Uganda, Kenya, South Sudan, and the Democratic Republic of Congo – were shelved. The Kellogg-Briand Pact and Stimson Doctrine proscribed the acceptability of conquest of sovereign nations, further closing the doors to Egypt’s ambitions of ever conquering Ethiopia. So, how would Egypt promote its water interests which are dependent on the uninterruptible flow of the River Nile?

A New Strategy

In the 1950s, a new (censurable) strategy was devised by Egypt to preserve its hydrological interests. This strategy can be surmised as follows:

Ethiopia must be prevented from developing the Abbay river basin. This is to be achieved using a combination of hostile diplomacy and instigation of internal instability – including fomenting Somali irredentism and domestic rebellions – so that priceless and irreplaceable resources are spent on wars rather than hydrological and agricultural developments.

To date, River Nile is key to Egypt’s survival, and this can make Egypt-Ethiopia contention over the shared Nile waters a zero-sum game. To drive the point home, most population centers in Egypt are found along the basin of the Nile River, and they include CairoGiza, and Alexandria which together host an estimated 35.4 million out of 101 million Egyptians. Also, farming is done in the fertile Nile valley, and drop in water volume in the river does cause a corresponding decrease in the area of arable land. This explains Egypt’s alarming concerns over damming of waters in the upper Nile basin, especially damming of the Blue Nile which provides the largest share of streamflow to the waters that flow through the Nile valley.

the Somalis would have never dreamt of such an idea without being incited by Nasser
The quote has been made using Quizio.

GERD and Some Questions

Under Meles Zenawi, Ethiopia took advantage of the Arab Spring in Egypt to start building a large gravity dam on Abay River (the Blue Nile). This dam was initially called the Millenium Dam based on its nature as a megaproject that would have dual-use – irrigation and electricity generation; and whose impact would be to spur economic development and improve Ethiopia’s food security, while limiting flooding across the fertile plains of Western Ethiopia. Later, its name changed to the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD). By the time Abdul Fatah al-Sisi had secured his authority in Egypt, GERD was a fait accompli. However, events in Ethiopia in 2020 threatened the stability of the nation and risked completion of GERD, as well as threatened the fate of its Millennium Reservoir. Most importantly, these events exposed Ethiopia to hostile diplomacy, accelerated the fissuring of ethnic cleavages, caused fracturing of the military, and worsened the putrescence of its domestic stability.

In 2020, Egyptians, Europeans, and Americans got an opportunity to turn the tables on Ethiopia, and they did this by exploiting the innovative offensive realism of the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF) to torpedo the poorly integrated defensive-offensive realism of the Ethiopian Federal government. At times, Europeans and Americans ally, coordinate, and/or integrate their actions under the auspices of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). Their collective actions have influenced the course of events in Ethiopia.

Most importantly, these events exposed Ethiopia to hostile diplomacy, accelerated the fissuring of ethnic cleavages, caused fracturing of the military, and worsened the putrescence of its domestic stability.GeopoliticsPress.comTweet

The sequence of events, and the cascade of human tragedies, which have happened since November 2020 raise the following questions:

This multi-part series will use the geopolitical lenses of realism and pragmatism to make sense and give meaning to these problems, as well as attempt to answer the questions


Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

On Key

Related Posts

VK Russian online social media and social networking service

© 2022 Esleman Abay. All rights reserved.

Follow Us